PDA

View Full Version : Linux is TOO hot for Microsoft to handle!


fos
07-02-2006, 09:44 PM
When it comes to super computers, Linux is too hot for Microsoft to handle!
(Maybe its due to the fact that Linux is open source - fos)

IBM's BlueGene/L computer at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in California, has once again been crowned world champion by the TOP500 list of the fastest supercomputers used for scientific applications. Ned Stafford digs into the story behind the fastest computers on the planet.

There are some familiar big names in the supercomputer market. IBM is the dominant supercomputer vendor, with Hewlett-Packard coming second. Intel microprocessors are used in 301 of the 500 systems. But Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) is growing quickly, Simon says.

In software, Microsoft is at the bottom of the list, with only two supercomputers using its operating system. The software king is Linux, used on more than 70% of the total.

You might be interested to know that today's average notebook computer is faster than the supercomputer that made the bottom of the TOP500 list in 1992. So you may already own the equivalent of a vintage supercomputer.

fos.... :)

Ref: http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060626/full/060626-12.html

krp
07-03-2006, 11:23 PM
When it comes to super computers, Linux is too hot for Microsoft to handle! (Maybe its due to the fact that Linux is open source - fos)

It is because of open source process. MS admitted that in the Halloween I memo.

krp

hacked1o0o
07-04-2006, 07:08 PM
windows also takes a hunk of processing power too , and linux can be formed into what they need it for.... kinda like clay i guess :)

jpaulb
07-13-2006, 08:33 AM
I did know that M$ had software that ran on anything other than the Intel/Amd 386 base.

Who would want to pay the M$ licence feees to run xP on 1024 cpu system, Linux cost the same no matter how many cpu are involved?

I saw an article a few years ago that M$ server farm was powered by Linux, although that could fall under the 10% truth law. Server farm is true, MS is true, Linux is true; but not necissary all in the same sentence true

bhobjj
07-13-2006, 01:34 PM
I saw an article a few years ago that M$ server farm was powered by Linux, although that could fall under the 10% truth law. Server farm is true, MS is true, Linux is true; but not necissary all in the same sentence true

A couple years ago Hotmail was running on Linux and then BSD. M$ claimed that the service was contracted out. There is still some use of Apache and FreeBSD:
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://ad.law10.hotmail.com